[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED4CF7C.8020808@atlas.cz>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:26:36 +0100
From: Clarinet <clarinet@...as.cz>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: Jiri Polach <clarinet@...as.cz>, 647095@...s.debian.org,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle
> Using an older "known-good" kernel, could you build and run the test
> case at the end of Documentation/rtc.txt a few times and see if it
> triggers the same problem?
>
> I'm suspicious that the setting the alarm is whats tripping the BIOS
> into enabling the HT bit. Because with older kernels, we used PIE mode
> irqs which hwclock usually uses at boot, but with newer kernels, we
> emulate PIE via AIE alarm mode. So if the BIOS was broken before, you
> wouldn't have noticed unless you tried to use AIE irqs.
>
> If this doesn't work, I'll get some patches to both 2.6.27 and 2.6.28
> kernels to debug the exact flow of how we're touching the hardware and
> then we can further narrow it down.
I ran the tests the following way:
- boot 2.6.37.6 - check /proc/cpuinfo - 12 processors
- halt
- boot 2.6.37.6 - check /proc/cpuinfo - 12 processors
- run rtctest
- reboot
- boot 2.6.37.6 - check /proc/cpuinfo - 12 processors
- halt
- boot 2.6.37.6 - check /proc/cpuinfo - 12 processors
- run rtctest
- halt
- boot 2.6.37.6 - check /proc/cpuinfo - 24 processors
So the conclusion is that only if rtctest is run and the machine is
halted, it triggers the HT problem. Reboot seems to "neutralize"
whatever rtctest did.
Jiri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists