linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1322579906.3619.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:18:26 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Cc:	tao.peng@....com, skinsbursky@...allels.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com, neilb@...e.de,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jbottomley@...allels.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from
 blocklayout routines

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 23:10 +0800, Peng Tao wrote: 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Myklebust, Trond
> <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: tao.peng@....com [mailto:tao.peng@....com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:40 AM
> >> To: skinsbursky@...allels.com
> >> Cc: Myklebust, Trond; linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; xemul@...allels.com;
> >> neilb@...e.de; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> jbottomley@...allels.com; bfields@...ldses.org; davem@...emloft.net;
> >> devel@...nvz.org
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> from blocklayout routines
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbursky@...allels.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:19 PM
> >> > To: Peng, Tao
> >> > Cc: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com; linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; Pavel
> >> > Emelianov; neilb@...e.de; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> >> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; James Bottomley; bfields@...ldses.org;
> >> > davem@...emloft.net; devel@...nvz.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> > from blocklayout routines
> >> >
> >> > 29.11.2011 16:00, tao.peng@....com пишет:
> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >> From: linux-nfs-owner@...r.kernel.org
> >> > >> [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> >> > Stanislav
> >> > >> Kinsbursky
> >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:11 PM
> >> > >> To: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
> >> > >> Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; xemul@...allels.com; neilb@...e.de;
> >> > >> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> > >> jbottomley@...allels.com; bfields@...ldses.org;
> >> > >> davem@...emloft.net; devel@...nvz.org
> >> > >> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> > >> from blocklayout routines
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This is a cleanup patch. We don't need this reference anymore,
> >> > >> because blocklayout pipes dentries now creates and destroys in
> >> > >> per-net operations and on PipeFS mount/umount notification.
> >> > >> Note that nfs4blocklayout_register_net() now returns 0 instead of
> >> > >> -ENOENT in case of PipeFS superblock absence. This is ok, because
> >> > >> blocklayout pipe dentry will be created on PipeFS mount event.
> >> > > When is the "pipefs mount event" going to happen? When inserting
> >> > > kernel modules or when user issues
> >> > mount command?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > When user issues mount command.
> >> > Kernel mounts of PipeFS has been removed with all these patch sets
> >> > I've sent already.
> >> Then it is going to break blocklayout user space program blkmapd, which is
> >> stared before mounting any file system and it tries to open the pipe file
> >> when started.
> >
> > Why on earth is blkmapd doing this instead of listening for file creation notifications like the other rpc_pipefs daemons do?
> Not sure how the original implementer chose this but I think it is
> likely because we do not expect the pipe file to be created or deleted
> dynamically.

Unless blkmapd can pin the sunrpc module (which it shouldn't be able to)
then that assumption would be wrong. Please look into fixing blkmapd...

   Trond
-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/