linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:25:01 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()

于 2011年11月29日 03:00, James Bottomley 写道:
>
> I'd vote for as a whole as well, but if there's some legitimate reason
> why not, then take them through Jiri's trivial tree; it's pretty trivial
> anyway and at least going that way would keep them bisectable.
>

Ok, I just made a branch which keeps these patches as a single one,

git://github.com/congwang/linux.git #kmap_atomic-single

As the single patch is 233K, so I don't send it to mailing list.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/