[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2r50qlmgk.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:09:47 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Perhaps a side effect regarding NMI returns
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
Not sure what problem Steven thinks is there. Once you
switched the stack any nesting is fine.
> I would suggest that the actual NMI handler itself should probably
> never use that paranoid exit at all, and just always use a regular
> iret. Screw scheduling and TIF checks.
The reason I added them originally is to prevent the race of remote
kernel events being delayed for a long time. With Frederic's nohz work
this will be more important in the future. Today it would be eventually
picked up by the regular timer interrupts.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists