[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111129034222.GD19506@localhost>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:42:22 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:31:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:47:45 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > > should be ulong, which is compatible with the bitops.h code.
> > > Or perhaps we should use a bitfield and let the compiler do the work.
> >
> > What if we do
> >
> > u16 mmap_miss;
> > u16 ra_flags;
> >
> > That would get rid of this patch. I'd still like to pack the various
> > flags as well as pattern into one single ra_flags, which makes it
> > convenient to pass things around (as one single parameter).
>
> I'm not sure that this will improve things much...
>
> Again, how does the code look if you use a bitfield and let the
> compiler do the worK?
It results in much clean code, as you may find in the V2 patches :-)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists