[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111129.185342.105454076866922618.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:53:42 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Cc: jamie@...ieiles.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:14 +0100
> Use the generic gpiolib gpio_is_valid() function to test
> if the phy IRQ line GPIO is actually provided.
>
> For non-connected or non-existing phy IRQ lines, -EINVAL
> value is used for phy_irq_pin field of struct at91_eth_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
I'm assuming this goes through the ARM tree, because in both of my networking
trees there is no ARM at91 implementation of gpio_is_valid().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists