| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20111130.004044.1357362466737795134.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:40:44 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: plagnioj@...osoft.com Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, jamie@...ieiles.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:44:03 +0100 > On 18:53 Tue 29 Nov , David Miller wrote: >> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> >> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:14 +0100 >> >> > Use the generic gpiolib gpio_is_valid() function to test >> > if the phy IRQ line GPIO is actually provided. >> > >> > For non-connected or non-existing phy IRQ lines, -EINVAL >> > value is used for phy_irq_pin field of struct at91_eth_data. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> >> >> I'm assuming this goes through the ARM tree, because in both of my networking >> trees there is no ARM at91 implementation of gpio_is_valid(). > yes the depending patch series is in the arm-soc > > can we have your ack or sob? Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists