[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1111300143340.31264@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:52:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, esandeen@...hat.com,
Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christopher Chaltain <christopher.chaltain@...onical.com>,
Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] deadlock with suspend and quotas
> > dm-ioctl.h:
> > /*
> > * Set this to avoid attempting to freeze any filesystem when suspending.
> > */
> > #define DM_SKIP_LOCKFS_FLAG (1 << 10) /* In */
> Thanks. I was now checking in detail and indeed FIFREEZE fails if
> ->freeze_fs is not set. And only xfs, ext3, ext4, reiserfs, jfs, nilfs2,
> and gfs2 provide this function. So I was correct in assuming that when
> filesystem supports FIFREEZE it must make sure no modifications happen to
> the filesystem. So I believe that my original plan for sync to skip frozen
> filesystem is correct.
>
> Honza
LVM doesn't suspend with FIFREEZE, it calls freeze_bdev directly from
drivers/md/dm.c (and it works for all filesystems, including ext2). So if
you skip sync of frozen filesystems, you introduce a data corruption if
someone takes a snapshot of ext2.
Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists