[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111130003716.GA11147@localhost>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:37:16 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] readahead: basic support for backwards prefetching
(snip)
> > @@ -676,6 +677,20 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > + * backwards reading
> > + */
> > + if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) {
> > + ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS;
> > + ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max);
> > + max = ra->start;
> > + if (ra->size > max)
> > + ra->size = max;
> > + ra->async_size = 0;
> > + ra->start -= ra->size;
> IMHO much more obvious way to write this is:
> ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max);
> if (ra->size > ra->start) {
> ra->size = ra->start;
> ra->start = 0;
> } else
> ra->start -= ra->size;
Good idea! Here is the updated code:
/*
* backwards reading
*/
if (offset < ra->start && offset + req_size >= ra->start) {
ra->pattern = RA_PATTERN_BACKWARDS;
ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max);
if (ra->size > ra->start) {
/*
* ra->start may be concurrently set to some huge
* value, the min() at least avoids submitting huge IO
* in this race condition
*/
ra->size = min(ra->start, max);
ra->start = 0;
} else
ra->start -= ra->size;
ra->async_size = 0;
goto readit;
}
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists