[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111130143122.GC21413@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:31:24 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC 1/2] tile: don't panic on iomap
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:04:41PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Presumably whoever wrote that architecture considered and discarded setting GENERIC_IOMAP.
> > >
> > > The tile PCI controller is apparently special in that it does not map the
> > > PIO region into MMIO space, or make it available in any other way, so generic
> > > iomap with IOCOND is pointless. Setting NO_IPORT will still mean that drivers
> > > using ioport_map will not be built. This mostly impacts the legacy (non-AHCI)
> > > ATA controllers, which I assume are not used on tile anyway.
> >
> > I don't object to setting NO_IPORT at all, but this won't help address
> > the problem this patch is fixing, which is to use a generic pci_iomap
> > on tile.
>
> Ah, right. I didn't realize that the generic pci_iomap still attempts
> to call ioport_map(). It would probably make sense to enclose
> the ioport_map() call in pci_iomap() inside of #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
> It's not exactly beautiful, but probably the most correct solution
> so that we can make any call to ioport_map() a build-time error on
> architectures that set CONFIG_NO_IOPORT.
>
> Arnd
I'm not sure why do you want to do that.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists