[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322664688.3180.6.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:51:28 +0000
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"android-virt@...ts.cs.columbia.edu"
<android-virt@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"embeddedxen-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<embeddedxen-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen port to Cortex-A15 / ARMv7 with
virt extensions
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 14:32 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I don't care much either way, but I think it would be good to
> use similar solutions across all hypervisors. The two options
> that I've seen discussed for KVM were to use either a virtual PCI
> bus with individual virtio-pci devices as on the PC, or to
> use the new virtio-mmio driver and individually put virtio devices
> into the device tree.
Let me just add that the virtio-mmio devices can already be instantiated
from DT (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.txt).
For A9-based VE I'd suggest placing them around 0x1001e000, eg.:
virtio_block@...1e000 {
compatible = "virtio,mmio";
reg = <0x1001e000 0x100>;
interrupts = <41>;
}
Cheers!
Paweł
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists