lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111130110029.c6a989af.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:00:29 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	gthelen@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kirill@...temov.name, avagin@...allels.com, devel@...nvz.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:56:57 -0200
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:

> This patch uses the "tcp.limit_in_bytes" field of the kmem_cgroup to
> effectively control the amount of kernel memory pinned by a cgroup.
> 
> This value is ignored in the root cgroup, and in all others,
> caps the value specified by the admin in the net namespaces'
> view of tcp_sysctl_mem.
> 
> If namespaces are being used, the admin is allowed to set a
> value bigger than cgroup's maximum, the same way it is allowed
> to set pretty much unlimited values in a real box.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

you need one more fix.
(please add changelog.)


> +static int tcp_update_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, u64 val)
> +{
> +	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> +	struct tcp_memcontrol *tcp;
> +	struct cg_proto *cg_proto;
> +	u64 old_lim;
> +	int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cg_proto = tcp_prot.proto_cgroup(memcg);
> +	if (!cg_proto)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	tcp = tcp_from_cgproto(cg_proto);
> +
> +	old_lim = res_counter_read_u64(&tcp->tcp_memory_allocated, RES_LIMIT);
> +	ret = res_counter_set_limit(&tcp->tcp_memory_allocated, val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> +		tcp->tcp_prot_mem[i] = min_t(long, val >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +					     net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_mem[i]);
> +
> +	if (val == RESOURCE_MAX)
> +		jump_label_dec(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled);

if (val == RESOUCE_MAX && old_lim != RESOUCE_MAX)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ