[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111201072649.GE16816@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:26:49 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Rakesh Iyer <riyer@...dia.com>
Cc: "rydberg@...omail.se" <rydberg@...omail.se>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Input: tegra-kbc - report wakeup key for some
platforms.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:14:03PM -0800, Rakesh Iyer wrote:
> Thanks Dmitry.
>
> Since there can be multiple wake causes I wanted to isolate wake key
> generation to the case where keyboard actually generated the wake
> interrupt.
I do not think you can guarantee this though because if user touches
keyboard "too early", before your resume method had a chance to disable
kbc interrupt as a wakeup source, you are still going to get that
interrupt and deliver KEY_POWER even though KBC is not the actual wakeup
source.
So don't over-complicate it. If hardware can't detect actual key pressed
just emit KEY_POWER if a key was at any time between calls to
tegra_kbc_suspend() and tegra_kbc_resume().
BTW, could you please have your MUA wrap long lines around 75 column or so?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists