linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf top: fix crash on annotate request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHVUoiQC5RjuHUsfPVTQ_C+W0Khp=hQC+_csP0+fJgUnoaALAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:17:49 +0300
From:	Brian Marete <marete@...hnix.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf top: fix crash on annotate request

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...radead.org> wrote:
> https://github.com/acmel/linux/tree/perf/core
>
> It just fell thru the cracks, sorry, I should have tried to reproduce
> and fix this on the tree you reported.
>
> But if you can try with the above tree...
>
> Persistence is key, thanks for using it :)
>

Hello Arnaldo, Thanks for your reply. The perf/core branch of the tree
you suggest above gives me the same crash (with what looks to me as
the same b/trace). Would you like the details of the b/trace? The
master branch of the said tree appears too old to me (so of course it
does not suffer the crash). Which other branch of the tree should I
try?

Thanks!

-- 
Brian Gitonga Marete
Toshnix Systems
Tel: +254722151590
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/