linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] jump_label: jump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1322756898.4699.30.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:28:18 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: jump_label for boot options.

On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:40 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> I should probably rename
> static_branch() -> 'static_branch_default_false()' to make that clear.

The rename doesn't really make sense until you can also provide
static_branch_true() also:

> Maybe we need an unbiased static_branch() too, but I'm not sure excatly
> how to implement it... 

I'd think the same way we got in this situation in the first place, go
kick some GCC people ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/