lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111201201237.GB23175@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:12:37 -0800
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
	Bob Pearson <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.1 00/14] crc32c: Add faster algorithm and self-test
	code

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:36:59 -0800
> "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patchset (re)uses Bob Pearson's crc32 slice-by-8 code to stamp out a
> > software crc32c implementation.
> 
> I think the attributions here are all messed up.  As the patches stand,
> it appears that you wrote all of them.  But I don't think that is the
> case.
> 
> If Bob wrote a particular patch then that patch should be sent with a
> From: Bob Pearson <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com> right at the start
> of the changelog so that he is recorded as the primary author.  If the
> email sender (ie: you) was the primary author then this attribution can
> be omitted and we fall back to using the From: from the email headers.
> 
> Also, every one of these patches should have you own signed-off-by,
> regardless of its authorship.  For reasons explained in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
> 
> Please fix these things up and resend.
> 
> Also, it would be conventional and useful if each patch title was
> prefixed by its subsystem identifier.  ie, "removed two instances of
> trailing whitespaces" should be titled "crc32: remove two instances of
> trailing whitespace" or "lib/crc32.c: remove two instances of trailing
> whitespaces".

Okay, I'll massage the changelogs to give them more descriptive subjects, and
fix the attribution chain.  Thank you for the feedback.

--D
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ