[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322775468.3729.26.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:37:48 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@...driver.com>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, paulus@...ba.org,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?]3.0-rc4+ftrace+kprobe: set kprobe at instruction 'stwu'
lead to system crash/freeze
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:44 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
> Do you mean we should push the original pt_regs (or that whole exception stack)
> downwards the location the new r1 point? Then its safe to perform this real
> emulated stw instruction. At last we will reroute r1 to that copied exception
> frame to restore as normal. Right?
Right. That way we don't have to modify the (sensitive) restore path, we
only hook around the do_work branch which is a lot easier and less
risky.
> Here I suppose so, I implement this for PPC32 based on the above understanding.
> I take a validation for kprobing do_fork()/show_interrupts(), now looks fine.
> Tomorrow I will go PPC64, and hope its fine as well.
>
> If everything is good I'll send these patches to linuxppc-dev next week.
Excellent, thanks !
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists