[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112011432110.27778@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:35:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [3.2-rc3] OOM killer doesn't kill the obvious memory hog
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > /*
> > * /proc/<pid>/oom_score_adj set to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN disables oom killing for
> > * pid.
> > */
> > #define OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN (-1000)
> >
> >
> > IIUC, this task cannot be killed by oom-killer because of oom_score_adj settings.
>
> It's not me or the test suite that setting this, so it's something
> the kernel must be doing automagically.
>
The kernel does not set oom_score_adj to ever disable oom killing for a
thread. The only time the kernel touches oom_score_adj is when setting it
to "1000" in ksm and swap to actually prefer a memory allocator for oom
killing.
It's also possible to change this value via the deprecated
/proc/pid/oom_adj interface until it is removed next year. Check your
dmesg for warnings about using the deprecated oom_adj interface or change
the printk_once() in oom_adjust_write() to a normal printk() to catch it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists