[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK=WgbYysMUQjWmgZhHBQJxcyG_J8H-f8FzZwSOVuTRjPRAiUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:20:59 +0200
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: use mandatory barriers for remote processor vdevs
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> And these accesses need to be ordered with DSB? Or DMB?
DMB (i.e. smp barriers) should be enough within Normal memory
accesses, though the other issues that were reported to me are a bit
concerning. I'm still trying to get more information about them, in
the hopes that I can eventually reproduce them myself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists