[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKnK67T9S6Z=f9qmn9ov7YNyTKjdDbOZHJDRO-7_fqkJGZzXbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:28:42 -0600
From: "Aguirre, Sergio" <saaguirre@...com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <snjw23@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/7] omap4: build fdif omap device from hwmod
Hi Ming,
Thanks for the patches.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> index 1166bdc..a392af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
> @@ -728,6 +728,38 @@ void __init omap242x_init_mmc(struct omap_mmc_platform_data **mmc_data)
>
> #endif
>
> +static struct platform_device* __init omap4_init_fdif(void)
> +{
> + int id = -1;
You could remove this , as it is being used only once, and never changed.
> + struct platform_device *pd;
> + struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> + const char *dev_name = "fdif";
> +
> + oh = omap_hwmod_lookup("fdif");
> + if (!oh) {
> + pr_err("Could not look up fdif hwmod\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + pd = omap_device_build(dev_name, id, oh, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0);
Just do:
pd = omap_device_build(dev_name, -1, oh, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0);
> + WARN(IS_ERR(pd), "Can't build omap_device for %s.\n",
> + dev_name);
> + return pd;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init omap_init_fdif(void)
> +{
> + if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> + struct platform_device *pd;
> +
> + pd = omap4_init_fdif();
> + if (!pd)
> + return;
> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pd->dev);
> + }
> +}
IMHO, you could reduce 1 level of indentation here, like this:
static void __init omap_init_fdif(void)
{
struct platform_device *pd;
if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
return;
pd = omap4_init_fdif();
if (!pd)
return;
pm_runtime_enable(&pd->dev);
}
Regards,
Sergio
> +
> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_HDQ_MASTER_OMAP) || defined(CONFIG_HDQ_MASTER_OMAP_MODULE)
> @@ -808,6 +840,7 @@ static int __init omap2_init_devices(void)
> omap_init_sham();
> omap_init_aes();
> omap_init_vout();
> + omap_init_fdif();
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists