linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ED83177.7070706@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:01:27 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	brgerst@...il.com, robert.richter@....com,
	Andreas.Herrmann3@....com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] rework of extended state handling, LWP support

On 12/01/2011 12:36 PM, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> 
> So I assume, if you have 10000s of processes on a legacy 32bit system
> that never do any FPU stuff or SSE optimizations, you might indeed waste
> a couple of megabytes. I don't think thats very realistic, but that's
> just my opinion.
> 

A couple of megabytes of *lowmem*...

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/