[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA7C2qjfWW8=kePZDO4nYR913RyuP-t+u8P9LV4mDh9bANr3=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 09:21:23 -0800
From: VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com>
To: Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver
because of worrying about possible misusage?
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org> wrote:
> You could certainly build a library to reach a different goal. The goal
> of vtuner is to access remote tuners with any existing program
> implementing the DVB API.
So you could finally use VDR as a server/client setup using vtuner,
right? With full OSD, timer, etc? Yes, I'm aware that streamdev
exists. It was horrible when I tried it last (a long time ago) and I
understand it's gotten better. But it's not a suitable replacement for
a real server/client setup. It sounds like using vtuner, this would
finally be possible and since Klaus has no intention of ever
modernizing VDR into server/client (that I'm aware of), it's also the
only suitable option as well.
Or am I wrong about anything? If not, I know several users who would
like to use this, myself included.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists