[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201112031913.32503.hselasky@c2i.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 19:13:32 +0100
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@....net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com>,
Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>, HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Hi,
Some input from the sideline reading this discussion. As a FreeBSD'er I would
very much like to see two things happen:
- vtunerc goes into userspace like a client/server daemon pair using CUSE and
can support _any_ /dev/dvb/adapter, also those created by CUSE itself. That
means I could potentially use vtunerc in FreeBSD with drivers like cx88:
http://corona.homeunix.net/cx88wiki
- DVB-X solution in Linux gets mmap support to avoid endless copying of data
between kernel and userspace.
--HPS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists