linux-kernel - Re: 3.2-rc2 freezes on boot for AMD K6 - bisected to commit bcb80e53877c2045d9e52f4a71372c3fe6501f6f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:15:17 -0600
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2 freezes on boot for AMD K6 - bisected to commit bcb80e53877c2045d9e52f4a71372c3fe6501f6f

On 12/03/2011 05:07 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@...inger.net>  wrote:
>
> Ugh. I hate that patch.
>
> It's completely stupid. If "rdmsr_safe()" doesn't work at that point
> in the boot, then it's pointless to call it.
>
> So this change is pure and utter crap:
>
>    -	rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL,&c->microcode,&dummy);
>    +	if (c->x86>= 0xf)
>    +		rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL,&c->microcode,&dummy);
>
> because it is misleading as hell: that rdmsr isn't *safe* at all, so
> why are we calling "rdmsr_safe()"?
>
> It's wrong.
>
> The right patch would either just remove the "safe" part (and just say
> that the register has to be supported if c->x86>= 0xf), but quite
> honestly, I don't see why we do that thing in early_init_amd() AT ALL.
> Afaik, the microcode version field isn't really *needed* by the
> kernelin the first place, much less is it needed by the *early* boot,
> so why isn't this in 'init_amd()' a bit later when the "safe" version
> actually *works*?
>
> IOW, I think the patch should be something like the attached (TOTALLY
> UNTESTED) patch. Larry, does this work for you? It just moves the
> rdmsr_safe() to the later function.
>
> Borislav?
>
>> I just updated mainline to 3.2-rc4, and that patch is not included. Please
>> check with Ingo to see why it was not available. It is a real show stopper
>> for old AMD CPUs.
>
> Ingo seems to have fallen off the earth for the last two weeks.
> There's *one* email form him about 12 hours ago, before that the last
> one I see is from early November.
>
> Ingo, everything ok?
>
>                     Linus

Linus,

With your patch, my K8 box boots fine running 3.2-rc4. If you wish, you may add 
a "Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>.

Thanks for the explanation, and the patch,

Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/