linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.12-rt30-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112042145440.2735@ionos>
Date:	Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:46:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Tim Sander <tim01@...i.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.12-rt30-rc2



On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Tim Sander wrote:

> Hi Steven
> > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.12-rt30-rc2.
> > 
> > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.
> Ok, this is a nearly blind shot, but i was expieriencing strange idle time 
> behaviour with this Ingo Molnar patch. The idle time was never incremented as 
> read from /proc/stat for several minutes. The system itself was behaving fine
> and had definetly not 100% load which was also verified with top.

Did some other time accounting increase instead ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/