[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDB5E70.5000209@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:50:08 +0000
From: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@...glemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
CC: x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, dilinger@...ued.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH resend 2] x86, olpc-xo15-sci: Enable lid close wakeup
control through sysfs
On 01/-10/37 20:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Let me fix that for you.
>
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c~x86-olpc-xo15-sci-enable-lid-close-wakeup-control-through-sysfs-fix
> +++ a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo15-sci.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static ssize_t lid_wake_on_close_store(s
> const char *buf, size_t n)
> {
> unsigned int val;
> - if (!sscanf(buf, "%u",&val) == 1)
> +
> + if (sscanf(buf, "%u",&val) != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> set_lid_wake_behavior(!!val);
>
> It's kinda irritating that this will cheerfully accept bogus input of
> the form "42foo". This happens about eleven billion times in sysfs
> write() handlers but afaik we've never implemented a nice
> sysfs_int_from_buffer() thingy which handles all the possible errors.
I thought there was.
strict_strtoul() ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists