| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPRPZsAc8wr_2KsRi3LnGi4ic-CzrFLbRvQfkrXckH--vaLkVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:36:32 +0100
From: Jeroen Van den Keybus <jeroen.vandenkeybus@...il.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc: "Huang, Shane" <Shane.Huang@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"Nguyen, Dong" <Dong.Nguyen@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unhandled IRQs on AMD E-450
> You previously said that unloading e1000 made things better. Did this
> affect both IRQs 16 and 19?
No, this only affects IRQ 19. IRQ 16 usually dies within 15min..2hrs.
> Can you check if this problem (on either 16 or 19) happens when you are
> not using the e1000 port (i.e., unplugged)?
The problem occurs with the e1000 idle (unplugged) and under heavy
usage (plugged). Time to failure is also in the same order of
magnitude (i.e. 1..30 minutes). As of now, I never had IRQ 19 disabled
with the e1000 removed. The e1000 delivered with Ubuntu isn't
particularly recent (7.3.21-k8-NAPI). Before I suspected a kernel
problem, I already tried the 8.0.35 compiled from source obtained from
Intel. Exactly the same result: IRQ 19 gets banned.
> The /proc/interrupts doesn't show e1000, but lspci does. ...?
You are right. I took that lspci after removing e1000, sorry for the
confusion. Please see the new /proc/interrupts:below.
> Does the problem occur without fglrx?
Good question. I'll try that immediately. Stand by.
> To get the AHCI interrupt away from IRQ 19, try the patch below.
> (But please don't show that ugly hack to any AMD guy. :)
I'll try that next too.
>> Is there any way of obtaining more output such as IO-APIC register
>> states to verify that it is indeed a stuck IRQ input line and not an
>> unsuccesful EOI ack ?
> In theory, lspci's "Status: ... INTx+" shows an active interrupt line.
Ok. In that case (taking the lspci from a failed system) no (listed)
device has INTx+.
Thanks,
J.
$ cat /proc/interrupts (with e1000 (eth1) still loaded - this dump is
after IRQ 19 is killed)
CPU0 CPU1
0: 45 26 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1 1 IO-APIC-edge i8042
5: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
7: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge
8: 1 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 1 3 IO-APIC-edge i8042
16: 121 559 IO-APIC-fasteoi firewire_ohci, hda_intel
17: 3 110 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1,
ehci_hcd:usb2, ehci_hcd:usb3
18: 0 4 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb4,
ohci_hcd:usb5, ohci_hcd:usb6, ohci_hcd:usb7
19: 198169 11097 IO-APIC-fasteoi ahci, eth1
40: 3601 71 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
41: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd
42: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd
43: 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd
44: 4 298 PCI-MSI-edge hda_intel
45: 0 3 PCI-MSI-edge fglrx[0]@PCI:0:1:0
NMI: 0 0 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 231521 231457 Local timer interrupts
SPU: 0 0 Spurious interrupts
PMI: 0 0 Performance monitoring interrupts
IWI: 0 0 IRQ work interrupts
RES: 37942 34198 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 256 225 Function call interrupts
TLB: 309 243 TLB shootdowns
TRM: 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
THR: 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts
MCE: 0 0 Machine check exceptions
MCP: 26 26 Machine check polls
ERR: 1
MIS: 0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists