[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDBA0F0.4000907@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:33:52 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-ring: Use threshold for switching to indirect
descriptors
On 12/04/2011 06:00 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > If you
> > copy descriptors, then it goes away.
>
> The avail ring could go away. used could if we make descriptors
> writeable. IIUC it was made RO in the hope that will make it
> easier for xen to adopt. Still relevant?
You mean RO from the consumer side? Why can't Xen do that?
> > That does suck. Are there issues in increasing the ring size? Or
> > making it discontiguous?
>
> discontiguous ring is what indirect is, basically.
No, discontiguous is more cache and prefetch friendly. With vmap(), the
code doesn't even change.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists