[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205104044.GI12507@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:40:44 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Liu ping fan <kernelfans@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aliguori@...ibm.com,
jan.kiszka@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: make vcpu life cycle separated from kvm instance
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:22:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 12:18 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >
> > > We can, but that's a bigger change.
> > >
> > Is it? I do not see a lot of accesses to vcpu array except those loops.
> >
>
> Well actually some of those loops have to go away and be replaced by a
> hash lookup with apic id as key.
>
Yes, but apic ids are guest controllable, so there should be separate hash that
will hold vcpu to gust configured apic id mapping. Shouldn't prevent us
from moving to rculist now.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists