[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205105201.GD11150@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:52:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
ben-linux@...ff.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, patches@...aro.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add regulator support for platform_lcd driver
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:06:17PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 5 December 2011 15:40, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Recent regulator discussion. it should be failed instead fall through
> > gracefully.
> Ok. But in this case, there could be boards that do not use a
> regulator for the lcd/display interface. Is it mandatory for fail if
> regulator is not found. Sorry, I have not read through the regulator
> discussion.
The boards should supply a fixed voltage regulator representing the
supply (or use CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY to substitute in a dummy regulator
when not needed). Sascha Hauer had some patches to add a flag that
could be set to enable this mode on init rather than through Kconfig but
they needed a bit of cleanup, not sure what the status is there.
> The constraint 'apply_uV' cannot be expressed with a device tree. So
> there has be a mechanism to set the required output voltage for a
> regulator.
It's not an option to not have it with device tree - if there's a single
voltage specified apply_uV is assumed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists