[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJbz7-2S-px8Xbz15nb2VDV3dQsaTYbnkxMtNHWDj43EGPLg5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 01:05:18 +0100
From: HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>
To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@....net>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com>,
Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver
because of worrying about possible misusage?
Hi,
> Some input from the sideline reading this discussion. As a FreeBSD'er I would
> very much like to see two things happen:
>
> - vtunerc goes into userspace like a client/server daemon pair using CUSE and
> can support _any_ /dev/dvb/adapter, also those created by CUSE itself. That
> means I could potentially use vtunerc in FreeBSD with drivers like cx88:
Vtuner already has userland client/server pair. The server application
is connecting to _any_ /dev/dvb/adapter device. Please look at small
picture here:
http://code.google.com/p/vtuner/wiki/BigPicture
That means the server part is using totally "clean" linux. Nothing more.
>
> http://corona.homeunix.net/cx88wiki
>
> - DVB-X solution in Linux gets mmap support to avoid endless copying of data
> between kernel and userspace.
Adding nmap support should be straightforward. I have it on my TODO.
Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists