linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: use the same node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:44:49 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use the same node_distance for 32 and 64-bit


* David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> > 
> > > The node_distance function is not x86 64-bit specific.  Having the #ifdef
> > > around the extern function declaration and the #define causes the default
> > > node_distance macro to be used in asm-generic/topology.h. This also causes
> > > a sparse warning in arch/x86/mm/numa.c when CONFIG_X86_64 is not set:
> > > 
> > > warning: symbol '__node_distance' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > 
> > > Remove the #ifdef to fix both issues.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> > 
> >  [ I think kernel.org emails are still down, so I sent this to
> >    htejun@...il.com instead. ]
> > 
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > 
> 
> Ingo, Peter, I don't think this was merged into any x86 tree 
> yet (and I gave up trying to figure it out, cloning from 
> tesla.tglx.de was going about 2kB/sec).
> 
> It was also acked by Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> during review.

No objections, could someone please resend it with all acks in 
place, and with maintainers Cc:-ed? I don't have the original 
mail in any of my folders.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/