linux-kernel - Re: Not really merged? Re: [merged] x86-paravirt-pte-updates-in-kunmap_atomic-need-to-be-synchronous-regardless-of-lazy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111205155647.GG28866@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:56:47 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	hpa@...or.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	stable@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: Not really merged? Re: [merged]
 x86-paravirt-pte-updates-in-kunmap_atomic-need-to-be-synchronous-regardless-of-lazy_mmu-mode.patch
 removed from -mm tree


* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:02:49 +0100 Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com> wrote:
> 
> > So, as of today, this seems to be back on the master branch of linux-next (I
> > guess from Andrew putting it back, but I am never sure with linux-next). But I
> > am not sure how/when this would go into Linus tree. I assume without any
> > specific action maybe merge window for 3.3...
> > We got some positive feedback on it from users running into the problem. So it
> > seems like a valuable change. From the discusions so far I take that technically
> > the change did not trigger resistance. For that reason I wanted to ask whether
> > there is a chance that this looks important enough to be pushed before the next
> > merge window...
> 
> I sent this patch to the x86 maintainers two weeks ago.  It 
> was ignored, as were the other 11 patches I sent.  Later I 
> will resend them all.  If they are again ignored I will later 
> send them yet again, and so on.

they are still sitting in my mbox - working down the backlog 
now.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/