linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111205172618.GA23387@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:26:18 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	benh@...nel.crashing.org, yinghai@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	tony.luck@...el.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	liqin.chen@...plusct.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, jonas@...thpole.se, lennox.wu@...il.com,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[],
 take 2


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> (cc'ing Stephen, hi!)
> 
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 05:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the
> > > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too.  Thankfully, benh pinged
> > > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed
> > > version.
> > 
> > A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if 
> > that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock 
> > if there are no objections from anyone.
> > 
> > It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are 
> > affecting non-x86 architectures, right?
> 
> Hmmm... this was part of the memblock updates going through
> x86/memblock and unless we're gonna setup a separate tree for memblock
> (I don't think that would be necessary at this point) I think it would
> be better to route this x86/memblock eventually.  That said, setting
> up temp linux-next branch for now sounds fine to me.  hpa, what do you
> think?

I'm fine with routing this through -tip - the branch can be 
tip:core/memblock as this is really not just an x86 series - but 
if you could pre-test all the arch impact in linux-next that 
would be great ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/