[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205184522.316598de@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:45:22 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
> But as you illustrated, there is a large number of drivers that already
> assume no IRQ is < 0, even if they don't use any IRQ #0 themselves.
> That is a much bigger problem to fix.
And a much larger number assuming the reverse is true which are hiding
potential bugs on ARM.
Looking at the serial stuff the best checks appear to be looking at
"irq", "-1" and NO_IRQ.
For migration stuff that's doing broken things like
if (irq < 0)
can be changed to
if (irq <= 0)
and that can be done before NO_IRQ itself is nailed on ARM and PA-RISC.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists