[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205205137.GA7916@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:51:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1][V3] Handle reboot in a child pid namespace
On 12/05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2011 12:08 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 12/04/2011 10:27 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>> * V3
> >>> - removed lock and serialization of pid_ns_reboot
> >>> * V2
> >>> - added a lock for the pid namespace to prevent racy call
> >>> to the 'reboot' syscall
> >>> - Moved 'reboot' command assigned in zap_pid_ns_processes
> >>> instead of wait_task_zombie
> >>> - added tasklist lock around force_sig
> >>> - added do_exit in pid_ns_reboot
> >>> - used task_active_pid_ns instead of declaring a new variable in sys_reboot
> >>> - moved code up before POWER_OFF changed to HALT in sys_reboot
>
> Oleg ? Are you fine with this patch ?
I already sent my reviwed-by ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists