lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205205647.GA1757@archminux>
Date:	Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:56:47 +0100
From:	Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste@...glez.org>
To:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] i915/intel-acpi.c: failed to get supported _DSM functions
 (was: [Dual-LVDS Acer Iconia laptop] i915/DRM issue: one screen stays off)

CC-ing intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org (see below)

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:00:41AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Add Cc. to platform-driver-x86 and linux-acpi
> 
> Hi Baptiste
> 
> 於 日,2011-12-04 於 17:07 +0100,Baptiste Jonglez 提到:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've got a lot of troubles with a dual-LVDS Acer laptop (it doesn't
> > have a keyboard, but two displays with touchscreens)
> > 
> > The Intel GPU is integrated into the Core i5-480M CPU: it's a bit
> > older than Sandybridge, as it seems to be based on the Arrandale
> > micro-architecture.
> > 
> > In the BIOS, both displays work fine; but as soon as the kernel boots
> > up, the second display (i.e. the one where you usually find a
> > keyboard) is turned off. The main display works as expected.
> > 
> > xrandr reports two LVDS displays: LVDS1, which is connected, and
> > LVDS2, which is marked as "disconnected". No matter what I tried, I
> > can't bring that second display up.
> > 
> > During the boot, just after the drm is set up, the following message
> > shows up:
> > 
> >   [drm:intel_dsm_pci_probe] *ERROR* failed to get supported _DSM functions
> > 
> > (attached is the relevant part of dmesg [1])
> > 
> > 
> 
> Have no idea for this _DSM error, need help from drm and acpi experts.

It definitely looks like an ACPI issue.
That function is defined in `drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c'.
The whole file was added more than a year ago by commit 723bfd707a97
(see the relevant thread on intel-gfx@ [1]) to "add _DSM support".
One of the first comment is about "Calpella", which is exactly the
platform of my laptop (as shown by lshw)

However, I honestly don't know what is wrong with that code...
Is there anything I can provide to sort things out?

> > I then tried booting with "video=LVDS-2:e". The same message shows up
> > while booting, with these two following:
> > 
> >   [drm:drm_crtc_helper_set_config] *ERROR* failed to set mode on [CRTC:4]
> >   fbcon_init: detected unhandled fb_set_par error, error code -22
> > 
> > (attached is the relevant part of dmesg [2])
> > 
> > With that kernel command line forcing LVDS2, the
> > "drm_crtc_helper_set_config" error shows up each time I switch tty;
> > additionally, X does not want to start anymore (spewing out the
> > aforementioned error multiple times before giving up)
> > 
> > 
> > I'm currently using the latest 3.2 kernel from linus' tree
> > (af968e29acd91ebeb4224e899202c46c93171ecd), but the behavior was
> > similar with a vanilla 3.1.2.
> > 
> > 
> > Other notes about this issue:
> > 
> >  - with an Ubuntu 2.6.35 kernel, the second display is on but
> >    flickering (with the picture distorted like an old analog TV...).
> >    The main display is working fine, as always.

I just bumped on bug report #29821 on freedesktop.org [2] which dates
the "flicker" bug around 2.6.35. I guess the ubuntu kernel doesn't
have the fix (and actually, the fix might be responsible for the lack
of output on the second display with later kernels.)

I'll try with an older kernel to see what it does.

> >  - with an Archlinux 2.6.37.5 kernel, the behavior is the same as with
> >    3.2, the main display is ok and the second one is off.
> > 
> >  - I did succeed, only once and out of pure luck, to get the second
> >    screen to work with the 3.1.2 kernel. I haven't been able to
> >    reproduce that... I had booted with "video=LVDS-2:e" and let the
> >    laptop running ; pressing a key a few hours later turned back
> >    *both* displays on (the main display had been turned off by DPMS,
> >    and the second, well, was off from the start, as always)
> >    While not very helpful, it shows that it's definitely possible.
> > 
> 
> What does Windows platform's behavior? Does there have any physical key
> that can turn on/off the second LVDS on Windows?

Actually, the first thing I did was wiping Windows out :)
>From what I've seen, both screens seem to work out-of-the-box on
Windows.

There are only two physical keys:
 - power-on button
 - "keyboard"-labeled button, which seems to do nothing
   hardware-related; it triggers an event caught up by acer_wmi.
   I think all it does is telling the OS: "hey, pull up the software
   virtual keyboard on the second display".

> >  - there are a some unhandled WMI events logged from the acer-wmi
> >    module [3] when closing the lid, opening it, and most importantly,
> >    when the (main) screen is turned on or off by DPMS.
> > 
> 
> I will look at your dsdt and log from acer-wmi then try to improve
> acer-wmi.

Thanks a lot!

> > What do you think? I haven't really succeeded in nailing the source of
> > the issue down, but here are a few possibilities I'm thinking of:
> > 
> >  - the driver is not aware it can drive two LVDS displays (not very
> >    likely, and it has worked once, see above)
> > 
> >  - there is some kind of switch that is able to turn the second screen
> >    on or off (I'm thinking of something like rfkill). If so, it looks
> >    like something non-standard and undocumented. This would explain
> >    the WMI events (see the last note above)
> > 
> 
> What's the behavior of Windows?

I meant an internal switch that would be controlled by GPIO or
such. It doesn't seem very likely though...

> >  - buggy ACPI implementation. I tried to extract then recompile the
> >    DSDT [4], and iasl spews out 17 errors and 12 warnings. Also worth
> >    noticing is that line in dmesg:
> > "pci0000:00: ACPI _OSC request failed (AE_ERROR), returned control mask: 0x1d"
> > 
> > 
> > The Archlinux userland is:
> >  - libdrm 2.4.27
> >  - xorg-server 1.11.2
> >  - intel-dri 7.11.1
> >  - xf86-video-intel 2.17.0
> > 
> > 
> > Please let me know if there are any other details I should provide.
> > Regards,
> > Baptiste
> > 
> > Attachments:
> > [1] dmesg-DSM-functions.log - drm errors when booting normally
> > [2] dmesg-video-lvds2.log - drm errors when forcing LVDS2 on the cmdline
> > [3] acer_wmi.log - WMI events that land in dmesg
> > [4] dsdt - /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT
> 
> Please also attached on dmidecode log.

See [3] for dmidecode, I've also provided the dsdt [4] again.
Here is also everything related to ACPI in dmesg [5].

> Thank's a lot!
> Joey Lee

Let me know if there's anything else I can provide,
Baptiste

[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2010-October/008339.html
[2] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29821
[3] http://zorun.tonbnc.fr/lkml/dmidecode
[4] http://zorun.tonbnc.fr/lkml/dsdt
[5] http://zorn.tonbnc.fr/lkml/dmesg-acpi.log
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ