linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:31:21 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes

On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 10:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Hm, not all were regression fixes and the branch was named 
> */core so i took it into perf/core.

Yeah it happened just at the end of the merge window. I didn't really
know what branch to name it.

> 
> Could you perhaps cherry-pick the most crutial regression fixes 
> into an urgent branch? We could still push that upstream.

Looking at each patch, I would say 6 of the ten need to go in. Most are
marked as stable since they break the last tree. I could just send them
all to stable if it seems strange to have this many patches in two pull
requests.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/