[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205215405.6ab53357@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:54:05 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver
because of worrying about possible misusage?
> How can usbip work if networking and usb are so different and what's so
> different between vtunerc and usbip, that made it possible to put usbip
> into drivers/staging?
Where usbip seems to have remained for a long time without actually being
made useful or correct enough to progress. Meanwhile most remote USB
device access is at a higher level and works beautifully (eg remote USB
printing).
Case proven I think rather than the reverse
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists