[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323123260.32012.44.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:14:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
ming.m.lin@...el.com, andi@...stfloor.org, robert.richter@....com,
ravitillo@....gov, will.deacon@....com, paulus@...ba.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
davem@...emloft.net, lethal@...ux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling
support (v2)
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:37 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> +#define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL \
> + (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL)
This PLM thing keeps popping up all over, I'm sure it stands for
something, but for now it just hurts my eyes.
> + /* at least one branch bit must be set */
> + if (!(mask & ~PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL))
> + return -EINVAL;
>
Why? we can create counters with exclude_user && exclude_kernel as well,
I mean, they're useless, but its perfectly valid.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists