[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206094203.GC3864@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:42:04 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux imx core driver
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:49:42PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> +static struct pinmux_ops imx_pmx_ops = {
> + .list_functions = imx_pmx_list_funcs,
> + .get_function_name = imx_pmx_get_func_name,
> + .get_function_groups = imx_pmx_get_groups,
> + .enable = imx_pmx_enable,
> +};
The pinmux core code will check the pinmux_ops as below. !ops->disable
is one of the checking, while you do not have .disable hook.
int pinmux_check_ops(const struct pinmux_ops *ops)
{
/* Check that we implement required operations */
if (!ops->list_functions ||
!ops->get_function_name ||
!ops->get_function_groups ||
!ops->enable ||
!ops->disable)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
[...]
> +static int __init imx_pmx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct imx_pmx *ipmx;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct imx_pinctrl_info *info;
> + resource_size_t res_size;
> +
> + info = (struct imx_pinctrl_info *)pdev->id_entry->driver_data;
> + if (!info || !info->pins || !info->groups || !info->functions
> + || (info->maxpin > info->npins)) {
You must mean !(info->maxpin > info->npins) here?
Regards,
Shawn
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong pinctrl info\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists