lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-b95a7bd700466c10fda84acbd33f70cf66ec91ce@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:58:03 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	jbeulich@...e.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	JBeulich@...e.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/apic] pci, x86/io-apic: Allow PCI_IOAPIC to be user configurable on x86

Commit-ID:  b95a7bd700466c10fda84acbd33f70cf66ec91ce
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/b95a7bd700466c10fda84acbd33f70cf66ec91ce
Author:     Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 07:49:30 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:21:05 +0100

pci, x86/io-apic: Allow PCI_IOAPIC to be user configurable on x86

This adjusts PCI_IOAPIC to be user configurable (possibly as a
module) on x86, since the base architecture code for adding
IO-APICs dynamically isn't there yet (and hence having the code
present everywhere is pretty pointless).

To make this consistent, a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() declaration
gets added, the class specifications get corrected (by properly
using PCI_DEVICE_CLASS() intended for purposes like this), and
the probe and remove functions get their sections adjusted.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4EDDD71A02000078000659F1@nat28.tlf.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 drivers/pci/Kconfig  |    4 ++--
 drivers/pci/ioapic.c |   15 +++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
index f02b523..37856f7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
@@ -98,11 +98,11 @@ config PCI_PASID
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config PCI_IOAPIC
-	bool
+	tristate "PCI IO-APIC hotplug support" if X86
 	depends on PCI
 	depends on ACPI
 	depends on HOTPLUG
-	default y
+	default !X86
 
 config PCI_LABEL
 	def_bool y if (DMI || ACPI)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/ioapic.c b/drivers/pci/ioapic.c
index 5775638..205af8d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/ioapic.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/ioapic.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/pci.h>
-#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct ioapic {
 	u32		gsi_base;
 };
 
-static int ioapic_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
+static int __devinit ioapic_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ exit_free:
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
-static void ioapic_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void __devexit ioapic_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct ioapic *ioapic = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
 
@@ -99,13 +99,12 @@ static void ioapic_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
 }
 
 
-static struct pci_device_id ioapic_devices[] = {
-	{ PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
-	  PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC_IOAPIC << 8, 0xffff00, },
-	{ PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
-	  PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC_IOXAPIC << 8, 0xffff00, },
+static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(ioapic_devices) = {
+	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC_IOAPIC, ~0) },
+	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC_IOXAPIC, ~0) },
 	{ }
 };
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, ioapic_devices);
 
 static struct pci_driver ioapic_driver = {
 	.name		= "ioapic",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ