lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:34:57 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver > Otherwise, it feels like we might need a strategy for migrating pretty > much everything if we don't want to end up in a mess. You really do anyway - lots of generic driver code knows !dev->irq is a valid test. That covers things like 8250 based UART hardware, network phy layer code and vast amounts more. The bugs will already be there because ARM isn't using 0, they just aren't getting seen or aren't getting hit. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists