[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206113458.1c247d79@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:34:58 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
> can we sinply introduce a macro irq_is_valid
See the 2005, 2006 and 2008 discussion.
if (!dev->irq)
is the proper test.
The <= is just a temporary thing while ARM gets its publically visible
house in order so it can be done without breakage.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists