[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206121401.GA12083@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:44:02 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>, alex.shi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> [2011-12-01 17:07:32]:
> @@ -4866,18 +4866,15 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick) {
> - cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick = 1;
> -
> - smp_mb();
> - /*
> - * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu().
> - * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
> - * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
> - * will be run before returning from the IPI.
> - */
> - smp_send_reschedule(ilb_cpu);
> - }
> + if (test_and_set_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(cpu)))
s/cpu/ilb_cpu?
Also given that 'cpu' argument to nohz_balancer_kick() is no longer used, we can
avoid passing any argument to it as well ..
> + return;
> + /*
> + * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu().
> + * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
> + * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
> + * will be run before returning from the IPI.
> + */
> + smp_send_reschedule(ilb_cpu);
> return;
> }
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists