[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206141929.GE17731@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:19:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver
because of worrying about possible misusage?
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:01:43PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 06.12.2011 12:21, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:41:38PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> >> Are you serious? Lower networking layers should be transparent to the
> >> upper layers. You don't implement VPN or say TCP in all of your
> >> applications, do you? These are just some more made-up arguments which
> >> don't have anything to do with the use cases I explained earlier.
> > For real time applications it does make a big difference - decisions
> > taken at the application level can greatly impact end application
> > performance. For example with VoIP on a LAN you can get great audio
> Can you please explain how this relates to the topic we're discussing?
Your assertatation that applications should ignore the underlying
transport (which seems to be a big part of what you're saying) isn't
entirely in line with reality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists