[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26E9B811E137AB4B95200FD4C950886BFFB4653B@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:58:59 -0800
From: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: BSP or CPU0 online/offline
> But the hibernation angle should be considered. Hibernation already has to deal
> with the case where someone physically unplugs a CPU and then resumes from
> the disk image, right? How does the hibernation code handle that case
> currently?
it'll fail the resume.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists