linux-kernel - Re: [tip:core/locking] lockdep, rtmutex, bug: Show taint flags on error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:55:58 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/locking] lockdep, rtmutex, bug: Show taint flags on
 error

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:48:51 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 15:34 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > If you disagree with a patch, do not silently drop parts of it.  I
> > demand that you remove my 'Signed-off-by' as this is not the change I
> > submitted. 
> 
> The easy solution is that I never take patches from you again, ever.
> Consider that done. I'll let Ingo see if he can remove your SOB.

In which case you are presumably ceasing to be a maintainer for that
code ? Your statement above appears to be inconsistent with the rôle of a
maintainer.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/