linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use jump_label for sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:10:01 -0500
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use jump_label for sched_feat()

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 06:15:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> These patches implement sched_feat() using jump_labels. The first is a section
> mismatch fix. The second patch provides a little infrastructure and the third
> patch applies it to make sched_feat() use static_branch().
> 
> It uses static_branch() coupled with unlikely/likely in order to control the
> branch block position. I haven't checked if it works, but it likely doesn't,
> although it should.
> 
> 

It doesn't. I played around with unlikely/likely a bit, and it
didn't seem to make a difference. That said, jump_labels could still be
an improvement here - it be good if we had some numbers, I guess.

Thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/