[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206200108.GA30264@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 21:01:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, robert.richter@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86, NMI: Add NMI IPI selftest
* Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * tip-bot for Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Commit-ID: 99e8b9ca90d688c3ac7d3a141b701c9694a93925
> > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/99e8b9ca90d688c3ac7d3a141b701c9694a93925
> > > Author: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> > > AuthorDate: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:14:26 -0400
> > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > > CommitDate: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:00:16 +0100
> > >
> > > x86, NMI: Add NMI IPI selftest
> >
> > The NMI test-suite has caught some badness:
> >
> > [ 0.179992] calling tracer_alloc_buffers+0x0/0x224 @ 1
> > [ 0.183417] initcall tracer_alloc_buffers+0x0/0x224 returned 0 after 0 usecs
> > [ 0.186658] calling init_trace_printk+0x0/0xf @ 1
> > [ 0.189992] initcall init_trace_printk+0x0/0xf returned 0 after 0 usecs
> > [ 0.193324] Brought up 1 CPUs
> > [ 0.196657] ----------------
> > [ 0.199989] | NMI testsuite:
> > [ 0.203322] --------------------
> > [ 0.206655] remote IPI:
> > [ 0.209991] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 0.213325] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c:109 default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0xdb/0x120()
> > [ 0.216655] Hardware name: System Product Name
> > [ 0.219987] empty IPI mask
> > [ 0.223321] Modules linked in:
> > [ 0.227015] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.2.0-rc4-tip+ #163124
> > [ 0.229987] Call Trace:
> > [ 0.233326] [<c102e2a2>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0
> > [ 0.236656] [<c101e04b>] ? default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0xdb/0x120
> > [ 0.239989] [<c101e04b>] ? default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0xdb/0x120
> > [ 0.243321] [<c102e373>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
> > [ 0.246655] [<c101e04b>] default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0xdb/0x120
> > [ 0.249988] [<c1024025>] test_nmi_ipi.constprop.2+0x55/0xb0
> > [ 0.253320] [<c10240c8>] remote_ipi+0x48/0x80
> > [ 0.256654] [<c102417d>] dotest.constprop.3+0xd/0x90
> > [ 0.259987] [<c1024265>] nmi_selftest+0x65/0x120
> > [ 0.263320] [<c14d4e73>] native_smp_cpus_done+0x15/0xff
> > [ 0.266653] [<c14ddf3f>] smp_init+0xdb/0xe2
> > [ 0.269988] [<c14cb7bb>] ? start_kernel+0x386/0x386
> > [ 0.273320] [<c14cb81d>] kernel_init+0x62/0x118
> > [ 0.276653] [<c138bb3e>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> >
> > That's an empty IPI mask. NOTE the boot parameters i used:
>
> I'm on paternity leave, [...]
Congrats! :)
> [...] so I hacked this up for now and compiled tested this.
> On Monday I can dive into this further if the patch below
> doesn't solve it.
I'll apply this one and will let you know if there are other
problems (but i think it will solve it).
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists